CapybaraKiller: 1 revision imported

2025-05-27T04:27:09Z

1 revision imported

← Older revision	Revision as of 21:27, 26 May 2025
(No difference)

wikipedia>Sdkb: Undid revision 1231503874 by Biogeographist (talk) for a page for beginners, the more concise explain was enough

2024-06-29T06:59:03Z

Undid revision 1231503874 by Biogeographist (talk) for a page for beginners, the more concise explain was enough

New page

<noinclude>{{pp-protected|small=yes}}</noinclude>[[File:Question book-new.svg|left|100px|link=|alt=]]
Wikipedia articles require '''reliable, published sources''' that directly support the information presented in the article. Now you know ''how'' to add sources to an article, but ''which'' sources should you use?

The word "source" in Wikipedia has three meanings: the work itself (for example, a document, article, paper, or book), the creator of the work (for example, the writer), and the publisher of the work (for example, Cambridge University Press). All three can affect reliability.

[[File:VisualEditor tool reference-ltr.png|frameless|border|290px|right|alt=Abstract graphic depicting referencing]]
Reliable sources are those with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. They tend to have an editorial process with multiple people scrutinizing work before it is published. [[WP:SCHOLARSHIP|Academic and peer-reviewed publications]] are usually the most reliable sources. Other reliable sources include university textbooks, books published by respected publishing houses, magazines, journals, and news coverage ([[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Statements_of_opinion|not opinions]]) from [[WP:NEWSORG|mainstream newspapers]].

'''[[Wikipedia:Self-published sources|Self-published media]]''', where the author and publisher are the same, are usually ''not'' acceptable as sources. These can include newsletters, personal websites, press releases, patents, open wikis, personal or group blogs, and tweets. However, if an author is an established expert with a previous record of third-party publications on a topic, their self-published work ''may'' be considered reliable for that particular topic.

Whether a source is usable also depends on context. Sources that are reliable for some material are not reliable for other material. For instance, otherwise unreliable self-published sources [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published and questionable sources as sources on themselves|are usually acceptable]] to support uncontroversial information about the source's author. You should always try to use the best possible source, particularly when writing about '''[[Wikipedia:BLP|living people]]'''.

These are general guidelines, but the topic of reliable sources is a complicated one, and is impossible to fully cover here. You can find more information at [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]] and at [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]]. There is also a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources|list of commonly used sources]] with information on their reliability.

Help:Introduction to referencing/Reliable sources - Revision history

CapybaraKiller: 1 revision imported

wikipedia>Sdkb: Undid revision 1231503874 by Biogeographist (talk) for a page for beginners, the more concise explain was enough